FAQs: Electric Power Market

ELECTRIC POWER MARKET – POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBs)

Are PCBs a Concern in the Electric Power Industry?

Prior to the ban on PCBs in the late 1970s, more than half of all PCBs manufactured in the United States were used as dielectric fluids and coolants in electrical equipment. Despite being banned by the Toxic Substances Control Act, PCBs already in use were permitted to remain in electrical equipment under a use exemption because they were not found to present an unreasonable risk to human health or the environment.  It was assumed that the authorized equipment would be phased out over time from attrition; and, the industry, as a whole, has been retiring PCB-impacted equipment since then. However, much of this aging equipment is still in use today.  

PCBs in Transformers

Transformers containing PCBs have been authorized for use for the remainder of their useful lives. However, transformers containing 500 parts per million (ppm) of PCBs or more (also known as “PCB transformers”) are subject to certain restrictions, such as prohibited use near food or feed locations or in/near commercial buildings. Other requirements include quarterly visual inspections, procedures to follow in the event of a leak, maintenance and reporting procedures, and provisions for protection to avoid transformer ruptures.

PCBs in Capacitors

Prior to 1978, a vast majority of liquid-impregnated capacitors produced in the United States used PCBs as the dielectric fluid. Large capacitors that contain 1.36 kg or more of PCB dielectric fluid (also known as ”PCB capacitors”), are permitted for use for the rest of their useful lives as long as they are located in a restricted area. Large PCB capacitors that are not located in restricted areas are prohibited. All small capacitors (containing less than 1.36 kg of PCB dielectric fluid) may continue to be used for their remaining lives without access restrictions.

PCBs in Electric Light Ballasts

Non-leaking PCB and PCB-contaminated fluorescent light ballasts are permitted for use for the rest of their useful lives.  When these ballasts are taken out of service, they must be disposed of properly as hazardous waste and are not to be sold to subsequent users. 

PCBs in Electromagnets, Switches, and Voltage Regulators

Most electromagnets, switches, and voltage regulators containing PCBs may continue to be used for their remaining useful or normal lives. The use or storage of a PCB electromagnet (500 ppm or more) in a location where human food or animal feed could be exposed to PCBs released from the electromagnet is prohibited.

Weekly inspections are required for electromagnets with PCBs if they are in use or stored for reuse and contain between 50 ppm and 500 ppm and pose an exposure risk to food or feed. No routine visual inspections are required for other PCB or PCB-contaminated (less than 500 ppm) electrical equipment in use or stored for re-use, but it is recommended that this equipment be inspected quarterly for leaks.

If a PCB Oil Spill/Leak Occurs, How Quickly Can PCBs be Analyzed During Cleanup?

The short version: in about an hour with the use of immunoassay field testing kits. These kits can be used to screen soil and concrete samples in the field to provide real-time analytical results. It is a quick means to determine whether additional removal of affected media is required before receiving confirmation sample results from a standard laboratory analysis. We have successfully applied this technology on numerous projects to eliminate costly re-digs and remobilizations, reduce the volume of material excavated (and associated disposal cost), and cut the time frames for remedial projects by 50% or more.

ELECTRIC POWER MARKET – COAL COMBUSTION RESIDUALS (CCR)

What are Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR)?

Coal combustion residuals (CCR) are the byproducts of coal burning at power generation facilities. Also known as coal ash, CCRs primarily consist of fly ash (fine, powdery, silica material), bottom ash (coarse ash particles such as sand and rocks), and several other secondary byproducts. CCRs may contain several toxic substances associated with negative human health effects, such as mercury, arsenic, lead and low levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.

CCRs may be generated wet or dry and the composition can be changed for transportation and disposal; some wet CCRs may be dewatered for landfill disposal, while some dry CCRs may be sluiced for disposal in a surface impoundment.  Millions of tons of CCRs are generated each year, producing one of the largest industrial waste streams in the United States. Approximately 40% of CCRs are recycled for beneficial uses (such as in cement and wallboard) and the remaining products are disposed of in landfills and surface impoundments.

Improperly managed CCRs can pose a risk to human health, wildlife and the environment. Poorly managed CCRs in landfills can cause groundwater contamination and fugitive dust emissions. Improper construction of CCR surface impoundments can cause catastrophic failures, which became evident in December 2008 when a CCR surface impoundment failure at the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Kingston Power Plant caused the release of 5.4 million cubic yards of CCR sludge and polluted water into the environment, damaging dozens of homes, contaminating nearby rivers and covering approximately 300 acres of land.

This event prompted the US EPA to initiate the Coal Ash Surface Impoundment Integrity Assessment Program in March 2009. Over the next three (3) years, the US EPA assessed the condition and safety of all above-grade CCR surface impoundments at over 200 power plants across the nation and made the resulting information available to the public. In response to the program, power plants across the nation took action to ensure the structural stability of their CCR impoundments.

Despite the success of the Coal Ash Surface Impoundment Integrity Assessment Program, yet another coal ash disaster occurred in February 2014 when a drainage pipe collapsed beneath a CCR impoundment at the Duke Energy facility in Eden, North Carolina. The breach resulted in the release of an estimated 39,000 tons of Coal Ash into the Dan River, which eventually coated approximately 70 miles of the river with a CCR slurry plume.

Public pressures as well as the US EPA’s extensive study on the effects of coal ash on human health and the environment lead to the signing of the Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities final rule (CCR Rule) on December 19, 2014. The final rule establishes technical requirements for the disposal of CCRs in landfills and surface impoundments under Subtitle D of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The CCR Rule was published in the Federal Register on April 17, 2015 and the effective date of the rule was on October 19, 2015. 

What is the CCR Rule?

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) published the Hazardous and Solid Waste Management System; Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities; Final Rule (CCR Rule) in the Federal Register on April 17, 2015. The purpose of the Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) Rule is to reduce the risk to human health and the environment from CCR disposal units by establishing national minimum criteria for new and existing CCR landfills and CCR surface impoundments.

All applicable CCR disposal sites are subject to the rule equally. There is no transition policy or grandfather clauses for particular units.  All CCR disposal units that are subject to the rule were subject to the requirements as of the effective date of the rule on October 19, 2015.

Who is affected by the CCR Rule?

The requirements of the CCR Rule apply to:

  • All active electric utility companies and independent power producers that fall within the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 221112.
  • All active CCR landfills and surface impoundments, both onsite and offsite of a producer’s facility.
  • Inactive CCR surface impoundments at active facilities.

The requirements of the CCR Rule do not apply to:

  • Coal ash resulting from electricity that was generated using fuel that is less than 50% coal.
  • The placement of coal ash in active or abandoned coal mines.
  • CCR landfills that stopped receiving coal ash prior to October 19, 2015.
  • CCR landfills and surface impoundments at facilities that have ceased producing electricity prior to October 19, 2015.
  • Coal ash that is used beneficially.
  • Coal ash generated at non-utility facilities or facilities that are not an independent power producer, such as hospitals or universities. 
  • Municipal solid waste landfills that receive coal ash.
How is the CCR Rule Enforced?

The EPA’s Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) Rule is structured in such a way that the EPA itself has no authority to enforce compliance. Instead, the rule allows for enforcement through state governments and citizen lawsuits under certain requirements. The EPA strongly encourages state governments to amend their regulations to align with the CCR Rule requirements; however, it has no authority to force states to do so. Therefore, the CCR Rule was designed to facilitate citizen-driven enforcement by requiring transparency.

The CCR Rule requires owners/operators of coal ash disposal units to post specific compliance data within a structured timeframe on a publicly accessible website. This data includes the coal ash unit’s operation and management plans, groundwater monitoring results, annual reports, inspection results and corrective action reports. As a result, such information as groundwater monitoring exceedances, high hazard potential classifications and fugitive dust complaints will be easily accessible to determine if legal action is warranted.

A state is able to enforce compliance of the rule by revising its solid waste management plan (SWMP) to include the CCR Rule requirements. If a state does not amend its SWMP, any person is able to sue the owner/operator for non-compliance under RCRA’s citizen suit provision (Section 7002(a)(1)(A)), even if the coal ash unit is in compliance with state regulations. However, even if a state government does amend its SWMP to align with the CCR Rule and the coal ash unit is in compliance with state regulations, any person may still sue the owner/operator to enforce federal criteria.

Most of the lawsuits will be brought forth by non-governmental, environmental groups. However, state governments are also allowed to sue the owner/operator of coal ash units for non-compliance under RCRA’s citizen suit provision. Therefore, even if a coal ash disposal unit is in full compliance with a state’s SWMP, that state government may legally take action against the owner/operator for non-compliance with the CCR Rule.

Although the EPA is unable to enforce the CCR Rule specifically, it is still able to take action against the owner/operator of coal ash disposal units under RCRA Section 7003 if an imminent hazard to human health or the environment exists as a result of past or present coal ash management. Conceivably, non-compliance with the CCR Rule could bolster the classification of imminent hazard.

Although the CCR Rule strongly promotes lawsuits against coal ash disposal unit owners/operators, enforcement actions must be justifiable and advanced notice must be given prior to litigation.  Citizens seeking to sue must first pass certain statutory prerequisites and constitutional requirements to bring forth legal action. They must also issue a notice of intent to sue, which allows the owner/operator a period of time to correct any alleged violations. Although the EPA has no power to enforce the law that it created, the CCR Rule is well designed to keep coal ash disposal units compliant with the regulations. 

What are the Technical Requirements of the CCR Rule?